AT&T Promises

Instead there's a San Francisco, and they don't.

Photo

Filed under  //  advertising  
Posted

Uncomplicated Really

P00016

A number of friends sent me the Fast Company article yesterday on the future of advertising http://bit.ly/cb4qiD.

It's a juicy read for sure but I think Neil Christie's (W+K) post in October gets to the core of the question http://bit.ly/bGobYA 

It's all about W+K of course but fair enough.

Filed under  //  Thought leadership   advertising  
Posted

Metaphors > Persuasion

Power_house_mechanic_cropped

Tom provided a great post for me recently on consumer rituals http://bit.ly/bgw0tZ and he's now taken on the task of metaphors and their role in advertising. I've challenged him to develop thinking around the digital space on this subject, which will follow in the future. Tom's an anthropologist working with major brands and advertising agencies based in NY.

Metaphor, Anthropological Insight, and the Advertiser’s Art of Persuasion

Thomas Maschio


The advertiser’s art of persuasion demands the use of powerful metaphors—metaphors that express fresh insight into the relationship between the consumer and the product and product category.  However, persuasiveness has a more mundane aspect as well.  This is the necessity for incorporation.   The advertiser needs to lead the consumer to a desire to incorporate the metaphor he has made of a product into the consumer’s life-way.  The advertiser uses metaphor to persuade the consumer that the product meets the needs of some aspect of his life.  If the metaphoric advertising message succeeds in making its point, it sells the product while it builds an identity for the product or brand.  The advertiser is a maker, a manufacturer of meaning, as is an artist.  Both must be masters of metaphor before they can be considered successful. But, the advertiser should take his initial clue as to how to fashion a compelling metaphor from the consumer.

 

Aristotle said that to be a masterful maker of metaphor is one of the surest signs of genius, for it indicates an ability to see the similarities in seemingly dissimilar things.  What this means is that the metaphor maker perceives powerful systematic connections between phenomena that had not been perceived before.  A successful metaphor gives us that ah-ha feeling.  It strikes someone as expressing a novel way of looking at things; it seems a flash of insight.

 

Cultural anthropology can help advertisers become more powerful makers, and masters, of metaphor.  We say this because the most effective anthropology, and the most effective marketing anthropology, attempts to ferret out systematic connections between cultural phenomena, such as consumer products on the one hand, and aspects of the overall cultural system on the other.  In laying bare these connections for the advertiser, anthropology provides him or her with a host of possible analogies and metaphors to use in communications strategies.  More to the point, cultural anthropology is especially effective in illuminating how consumers themselves understand the nature of products through metaphors of the consumers’ own making.  Successful advertising often requires that the advertiser recognize how consumers metaphorically associate products with certain ideas and values.  By becoming aware of the consumer’s own metaphor, the advertiser is tapping into a rich set of meanings surrounding needs and emotions.  The advertiser can then build communications strategies around these metaphoric associations and in the process refine and dramatize them.

 

This sounds somewhat high-fallutin’.  Let’s put forward a concrete example of what we mean.

 

In one of my research projects my brief was to uncover the consumer’s relationship to car parts—spark plugs, engine valves, etc.  The advertiser was particularly interested in charting out the varying degrees of emotional investment that different market segments have in these products.  But, we were warned, the phrase “car parts” often evokes a wry smile in consumers.  The category seemed “low involvement”.  I often hear this phrase in preliminary meetings with clients who feel that the product category as a whole simply lacks emotional pizzazz and that consumers simply don’t engage with the category emotionally.

 

In cases such as this the client and advertiser inevitably begin searching for a hook, a way to associate the product line and brand with a compelling message.  They need to push the process of incorporation forward.  They need to have the consumer incorporate some compelling meaning about the brand into their own lives.  They need a powerful metaphor.

 

However, in the case of the car parts project and in most others I have done, we found that people were already creating their metaphors about the category.  The process of incorporation was already going forward in the culture at large.  The research found out precisely how.

 

We found our metaphor when we considered this product line’s relationship to male and female gender roles.  In our interviews we noticed that car parts played a rather important part in the life stories of many of our male respondents.   Working and middle class men frequently had a fascination with muscle cars and muscle car parts in their youth.  Though many had outgrown such interests long ago, they retained a feeling that car parts are part of the masculine domain of expertise.  Many continued to take pride in this expertise.  The knowledge of car parts had become one of many markers of male identity for them.

 

As men mature, they take on different social roles and develop different aspects of their gender identities.  This affects their relationship to products in rather dramatic ways.  As regards car parts, young men’s enthusiasm for muscle cars, and for parts that added speed and power to cars, reflected their need to display physical prowess and “cool”.  For many young male respondents car parts and cars themselves were but thinly veiled metaphors for, and advertisements of, sexuality.  Older, family men had by and large lost such concerns and no longer felt the need to advertise themselves sexually in this way.  They, in contrast, were interested in car parts being durable and dependable, rather than simply powerful.  We perceived how these respondents had begun to view the product category in terms of their own social role of family protector.  In fact, many of our more middle-aged male respondents took a good deal of emotional satisfaction from placing a mantle of protection over their family by overseeing the maintenance of the family car or fleet of cars.  The real emotional hook for this market segment was the idea of protection.  Men felt they were exercising the male role of protector through the overseeing of car repairs and the like.  The trick then was to associate the product with this aspect of the male role.

 

The advertising campaign was based on a metaphoric sentence:  “Brand X car parts equal male concern and protectiveness.” The advertising imagery flowed from this metaphoric sentence.  Further, the metaphor was already in the culture—it was already in the consumer’s mind.  The advertising sharpened the image, but did not create it out of thin air.  Consumers were already searching for a product benefit of “protection” when they purchased specific car part brands, and were associating preferred brands with this value.  The advertising took the further step of explicitly linking this product benefit to an image of the male as protector.  The product was thus portrayed as the consumer’s ally—helping him to realize the value of “protection”. 

 

It is of course the job of advertising creatives to come up with specific metaphoric scripts that condense a host of metaphoric meanings and messages within their compass and then covey these meanings to the consumer.  It is not an exaggeration to say that creatives are commercial image poets.  Some commercials have the quality of a haiku poem.  They condense meaning through sharp, economical metaphoric imagery.  Sometimes the most economical imagery results in the most effective advertising message.

 

Anthropological research can be useful to advertisers as they create their poetry because it lays bare a host of metaphoric possibilities for them.  It provides them with a variety of analogies to think with.  At the same time it can show them which metaphors make most sense culturally.  In short, it can help advertisers become “Masters of Metaphor”. ©

 

Contact Tom at tom@maschioconsulting.com

Filed under  //  Thought leadership   advertising   anthropology  
Posted

Magic & Logic

Picture_6

Some of you may be very familiar with procurement relationships but understanding the (necessary) division between emotion and logic is another thing.

While our experiences of procurement vary quite dramatically, the concept behind procurement is very solid.

ISBA in collaboration with the IPA in the UK developed a very good document on the role and relationship agencies and clients should have with procurement.

Its target can learn a lot from this document.

The link below provides a download of the document.

www.isba.org.uk/isba/filegrab/1ISBA-MagicLogic.pdf?ref=232

Filed under  //  advertising  
Posted

The future of Advertising

1763393507_947cb3702e

My two friends Jon Bond and John Winsor have just recently joined together and here they chat about the future of advertising.

Jon paints an interesting and very true picture of the business we're in.

I like his quote "I love ad people and the ideas part of the business. It's the “business” of the business that really sucks and brings down the rest of it."

There's the whole FTE issue discussed and I think John Winsor puts this in perspective brilliantly "Clients want the best creative work without having to pay for bloated agency infrastructures, but the current paradigm is built on a full time employee (FTE) compensation model. This means access to the top 25 talent comes with a price tag that includes the cost of the other 475 people at the agency."

As someone who is running an agency now, I get the seduction of using FTEs in negotiations because the model exists and clients get it, however a project based model has to be the way to go. All it requires is a progressive CFO, a persuasive CEO and the energy to create new models in the agency and with the clients. It's back to talent once again.

Read the article here http://bit.ly/cdsjn3

Filed under  //  advertising  
Posted

Show & Tell

Screen_shot_2010-04-25_at_10

I met with the guys at Google last week and they showed me their new Show & Tell site for Youtube, which is targeted at creatives in an effort to help them better understand the potential of Youtube. Check it out http://www.youtube.com/ytshowandtell#

The Barbarian group has just posted an article about the development of this site http://bit.ly/9rERiV

Change in creative focus will only happen when efforts like this one gain traction or awards in this territory start to matter.

Filed under  //  advertising   digital  
Posted

Aired

</object>
I know it's youtube's own blog but this interview with the VP of Digital Sport at Nike is interesting and the content's engaging.

This quote from Stefan Olander says it all "It's liberating for a creative company like Nike not to be limited by 15/30/60 ad formats created by the media industry. YouTube's format gives us complete freedom to create the most compelling stories without time limitations. We never start with the time length, we start with the most compelling story."

Check it out http://bit.ly/akTuUZ

Filed under  //  advertising  
Posted

Earl Woods Asks Tiger


This is a powerful ad that captures the density of the situation that took over Tiger's life.

Once again Nike (Wieden) has captured intense drama through stillness.

Filed under  //  advertising  
Posted

Kindle Just Got Creative


One of the many good things about iPad's introduction is its creation of a competitive environment in the eReader category, which forces the likes of Kindle to develop advertising that's worth viewing more than once. Very cool work created by photographers Angela Kohler and Ithyle Griffiths, starring actress Annie Little and model Ryan Curry. Original song "Stole Your Heart" written and performed by Marcus Ashley and Annie Little and "Fly Me Away" written and performed by Annie Little.

Filed under  //  advertising  
Posted

Crowdsourcing 2.0

Screen_shot_2010-03-25_at_9
Just read a great article by my friend John Winsor on crowdsourcing and Victors & Spoils' approach to the new advertising model.

There are a number of excellent nuggets to be found. I particularly like John's view that brands deserve an alternative to the current advertising agency model.

He talks about the ad agency holding on to its legacy - basically in my book they are generally too fat to change. "Agencies are trying desperately to protect the old way of doing business while bigger cultural trends are shifting the sand below their feet."

He also makes the point that it's about the quality in that achieves the quality out. "It still comes down to the strategic and creative direction to make sure the work produced by any crowd, either internal or external, pushes the work forward in the right direction to accomplish a client’s objectives." An obvious statement perhaps yet we still see client briefs that are just lazy in their effort and agency teams scratching their heads trying to work out what is really needed for a brand.

John supports the rigor required behind good crowdsourcing on his blog “Brands need an alternative to current ad agencies and crowdsourcing platforms. One that offers the strategic direction, engagement and relationship management that agencies deliver today but one that also delivers engagement, connectivity, creativity, and ROI that crowdsourcing platforms have the potential to deliver.” I think a point here is that it's not smart to jump in to crowdsourcing as the solve all solution to the current ad agency model frustration. You have to look to the quality of the crowd and the initiator of the exercise and assess these before making any commitment.

While on a completely different subject, I completely agree with John's view on the silo sickness that industries and agencies are suffering. The silos have always been there but I suspect our sensitivity to them has increased thanks to technology's ability to show us the benefits of being able to cut through existing walls. There's a long way to go for sure.

"When Alex Bogusky and I were doing research for our latest book, Baked In: Creating Products and Businesses that Market Themselves, we noticed that the biggest stumbling block to being more innovative for most companies were the internal silos that have been created.

Marketing is a silo.
Product Design is a silo.
Innovation is often its own silo.
To be more innovative companies must knock down the internal silos and start to get everyone working together."

I have one concern with John's interview/pitch on the V&S model. There's too much emphasis on the cost benefit versus the genetic truth that quality rises to the top. He makes both points but for me right now the battle should be focused not on the cost aspect but the ability to get to great ideas. Great ideas are worth the price.

In my opinion, John's right that crowdsourcing has a far stronger potential to deliver great ideas than the traditional model right now but great ideas, great thinking, great creativity should be able to come from anywhere even an ad agency. I would say the enemy is legacy not price but legacy is cursed by overheads and silos. 

John will not hate me for saying this because I know he would agree and also because his passion is for great work no matter where it comes from.

Check out the article here http://bit.ly/dkONYO

Filed under  //  advertising   crowdsourcing  
Posted